Transcript
0:00 Almost immediately there's way less crows. There's the mental model is kind of like garbage so I got rid of that. The motivation is way thinner and way easier to read. Mhm. >> Uh in my opinion. It's just less text like size wise. And then it starts off directly with like just like the very very basic example. Talks about the most common use cases that fact you can not name stuff for debugging use cases and then it goes straight towards like like the previous example just started talking about middleware.
0:30 >> [music] >> Well, why are we going to middleware right away? We should talk about the design decisions that we actually made and it's way easier for someone that's just skimming to digest it. Yeah. I think it's an important to remember that the models tend to read this all like a human would, right? And so if you just jump into the kind of an immediate rest, you start with something very specific and you don't have this like layered top-down approach, it's going to be a lot harder for the models to understand.
Summary
- Significant reduction in the number of crows (likely a metaphor for complexity).
- Simplified mental models lead to clearer motivation and easier reading.
- Less text size contributes to improved digestibility of information.
- The document starts with basic examples and common use cases for better engagement.
- Direct approach to middleware is questioned; design decisions should be explained first.
- Emphasizes the importance of a clear structure for models to process information effectively.
- A layered top-down approach may hinder understanding for both humans and models.